Publication summary
26%12 analyzed articles/videos23,307 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bolts results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 4.7% saturation with 4,257 hits. Analysis detected 39,190 faulty-reasoning hits from 90,416 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.8% and a BS Rank of 11% (509 of 570 publications). This Bolts is better (less manipulative) than 89.30% of the peer group.
Bolts
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
1%Montana Free Press1%
1%Signal Cleveland1%
1%Just Security1%
1%BridgeDetroit1%
11%Bolts (selected)1%
100%The White House9%
100%Utah Hockey Club10%
100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
100%MS NOW Live Events26%
100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
Publication details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

11% percentile
025507510010.7% percentile
0.8% BS Score12 analyzed articles90.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 3.2%3.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Publication 0.1%0.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Publication 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Publication 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Publication 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Publication 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 4.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate