Author summary
80% 1 analyzed article/video 2,275 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Piper French results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 953 hits . Analysis detected 6,391 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,100 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 37% (6,029 of 9,471 authors). This Piper French is better (less manipulative) than 63.70% of the peer group. Piper French
Author details
Total words: 9,100
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.3% percentile 1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.5% 10.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.8% 0.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.2%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Author 8.3%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst