Author summary
17% 1 analyzed article/video 2,553 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Felipe De La Hoz results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 677 hits . Analysis detected 3,821 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,212 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 18% (7,579 of 9,137 authors). This Felipe De La Hoz is better (less manipulative) than 82.90% of the peer group. Felipe De La Hoz
Author details
Total words: 10,212
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.1% percentile 1.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles10.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst