Topic summary
65% 18 analyzed articles/videos 14,075 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wnba results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 5,011 hits . Analysis detected 42,250 faulty-reasoning hits from 54,360 analyzed words across 18 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 18% (18,040 of 21,958 topics). This Wnba is better (less manipulative) than 82.20% of the peer group. Wnba
Topic details
Total words: 54,360
Article count: 18
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.8% percentile 1.5% BS Score18 analyzed articles54.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 9.2% 9.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst