Author summary
53% 2 analyzed articles/videos 886 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alissa Hirsh results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 354 hits . Analysis detected 2,669 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,544 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 60% (3,568 of 8,909 authors). This Alissa Hirsh is worse (more manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group. Alissa Hirsh
Author details
Total words: 3,544
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.0% percentile 2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.0% 10.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.0%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst