Author summary
94% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,152 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jon Root results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28.3% saturation with 3,562 hits . Analysis detected 18,326 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,608 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 69% (2,868 of 9,053 authors). This Jon Root is worse (more manipulative) than 68.30% of the peer group. Jon Root
Author details
Total words: 12,608
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.3% percentile 3.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles12.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 28.3% 28.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.1% 11.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.7% 5.7% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 7.0% 7.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 11.6% 11.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 28.3%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.6%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 10.0%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 1.4% In-Group Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Author 5.7%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Straw Man: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst