Topic summary
95% 16 analyzed articles/videos 14,799 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Title Ix results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 7,680 hits . Analysis detected 72,980 faulty-reasoning hits from 63,176 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 41% (13,215 of 22,261 topics). This Title Ix is better (less manipulative) than 59.40% of the peer group. Title Ix
Topic details
Total words: 63,176
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.6% percentile 2.1% BS Score16 analyzed articles63.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 12.2% 12.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.1% 10.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 9.3% 9.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 9.3% 9.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 1.4% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst