Author summary
92% 1 analyzed article/video 1,513 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Riley Gaines results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Indoctrination , and Politically Right Leaning Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 895 hits . Analysis detected 7,100 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,052 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 63% (3,268 of 8,764 authors). This Riley Gaines is worse (more manipulative) than 62.70% of the peer group. Riley Gaines
Author details
Total words: 6,052
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.7% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 9.5% 9.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 14.8% 14.8% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 9.3% 9.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.0% 10.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Author 9.5%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 9.3%, sitewide 1.4% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Author 8.4%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.1% Straw Man: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst