Author summary
92%1 analyzed article/video1,513 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Riley Gaines results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Indoctrination, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 895 hits. Analysis detected 7,100 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,052 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 63% (3,268 of 8,764 authors). This Riley Gaines is worse (more manipulative) than 62.70% of the peer group.
Riley Gaines
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
63%Riley Gaines (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,052
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

63% percentile
025507510062.7% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.9%4.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.5%7.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.7%0.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 9.5%9.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 14.8%14.8%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 9.3%9.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 8.4%8.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 10.0%10.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Author 9.5%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 9.3%, sitewide 1.4%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Author 8.4%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.1%Straw Man: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.9%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos