Author summary
93% 36 analyzed articles/videos 28,990 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jackson Thompson results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 13,127 hits . Analysis detected 119,509 faulty-reasoning hits from 129,230 analyzed words across 36 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 34% (6,067 of 9,078 authors). This Jackson Thompson is better (less manipulative) than 66.80% of the peer group. Jackson Thompson
Author details
Total words: 129,230
Article count: 36
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.2% percentile 1.7% BS Score36 analyzed articles129.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.2% 10.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.3% 3.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst