Topic summary
87% 7 analyzed articles/videos 1,014 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Spacex Ipo results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 1,543 hits . Analysis detected 17,771 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,592 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 55% (10,836 of 23,646 topics). This Spacex Ipo is worse (more manipulative) than 54.20% of the peer group. Spacex Ipo
Topic details
Total words: 16,592
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.2% percentile 2.6% BS Score7 analyzed articles16.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.6% 7.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 9.3% 9.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 8.1% 8.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst