Author summary
27% 11 analyzed articles/videos 4,853 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jamie Carter results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 5.4% saturation with 1,447 hits . Analysis detected 13,514 faulty-reasoning hits from 26,906 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 16% (7,980 of 9,471 authors). This Jamie Carter is better (less manipulative) than 84.30% of the peer group. Jamie Carter
Author details
Total words: 26,906
Article count: 11
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.7% percentile 1.3% BS Score11 analyzed articles26.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.5% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst