Topic summary
76% 12 analyzed articles/videos 9,218 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Solar Energy results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 2,795 hits . Analysis detected 27,380 faulty-reasoning hits from 36,643 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 18% (19,120 of 23,188 topics). This Solar Energy is better (less manipulative) than 82.50% of the peer group. Solar Energy
Topic details
Total words: 36,643
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.5% percentile 1.5% BS Score12 analyzed articles36.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.0% 5.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst