Author summary
64% 1 analyzed article/video 910 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Natalie Cohen results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Optimism Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 340 hits . Analysis detected 2,168 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,640 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 50% (4,626 of 9,195 authors). This Natalie Cohen is better (less manipulative) than 50.30% of the peer group. Natalie Cohen
Author details
Total words: 3,640
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.7% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 9.3% 9.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.2% 2.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 9.3%, sitewide 3.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Nature: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.2% Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst