Topic summary
79% 11 analyzed articles/videos 6,512 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Smart Glasses results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 4,204 hits . Analysis detected 32,654 faulty-reasoning hits from 35,852 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 31% (16,959 of 24,549 topics). This Smart Glasses is better (less manipulative) than 69.10% of the peer group. Smart Glasses
Topic details
Total words: 35,852
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.9% percentile 1.8% BS Score11 analyzed articles35.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 11.7% 11.7% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 0.5% Halo Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst