Topic summary
â 69% 8 analyzed articles/videos 5,770 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Polling results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Optimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 2,071 hits . Analysis detected 19,966 faulty-reasoning hits from 30,693 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of â 13% (21,461 of 24,545 topics). This Political Polling is better (less manipulative) than 87.40% of the peer group. Political Polling
Topic details
Total words: 30,693
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.6% percentile 1.3% BS Score8 analyzed articles30.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.1% 0.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst