Author summary
56% 1 analyzed article/video 916 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nashville Banner results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 236 hits . Analysis detected 2,213 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,664 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 52% (4,184 of 8,570 authors). This Nashville Banner is worse (more manipulative) than 51.20% of the peer group. Nashville Banner
Author details
Total words: 3,664
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.2% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.2% 3.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 6.4% 6.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 3.0% 3.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.4%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Recency Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Red Herring: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Genetic Fallacy: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.5% False Dilemma: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.4% Burden of Proof: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst