Publication summary
35% 12 analyzed articles/videos 7,562 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nashville Scene results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 3,114 hits . Analysis detected 20,405 faulty-reasoning hits from 38,368 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 30% (384 of 548 publications). This Nashville Scene is better (less manipulative) than 70.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 38,368
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.0% percentile 1.1% BS Score12 analyzed articles38.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 4.0% 4.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 1.5% 1.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 3.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 8.1%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 3.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst