Author summary
77% 1 analyzed article/video 704 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jason Shawhan results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Halo Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28.2% saturation with 793 hits . Analysis detected 3,295 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,816 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 83% (1,536 of 8,709 authors). This Jason Shawhan is worse (more manipulative) than 82.40% of the peer group. Jason Shawhan
Author details
Total words: 2,816
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.4% percentile 4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 28.2% 28.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.6% 7.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.7% 0.7% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.3% 6.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 28.2%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.3%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.8%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 10.2%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 7.2%, sitewide 1.9% In-Group Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.0%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.1% Horn Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Genetic Fallacy: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst