Topic summary
83% 24 analyzed articles/videos 24,085 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Philanthropy results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 8,302 hits . Analysis detected 75,781 faulty-reasoning hits from 127,659 analyzed words across 24 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 7% (20,343 of 21,681 topics). This Philanthropy is better (less manipulative) than 93.80% of the peer group. Philanthropy
Topic details
Total words: 127,659
Article count: 24
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.2% percentile 1.1% BS Score24 analyzed articles127.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst