Topic summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video811 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Open-Source Technology results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 579 hits. Analysis detected 4,274 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,244 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (5,780 of 24,545 topics). This Open-Source Technology is worse (more manipulative) than 76.50% of the peer group.
Open-Source Technology
Topic details
Total words: 3,244
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

77% percentile
025507510076.5% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.3%6.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 17.9%17.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.1%16.1%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 11.9%11.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.2%7.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 9.3%9.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 6.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 3.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos