Author summary
88% 1 analyzed article/video 811 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Guest Author results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Politically Right Leaning Bias , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 579 hits . Analysis detected 4,274 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,244 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 82% (1,688 of 9,352 authors). This Guest Author is worse (more manipulative) than 82.00% of the peer group. Guest Author
Author details
Total words: 3,244
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.0% percentile 4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 17.9% 17.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.1% 16.1% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 11.9% 11.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 7.2% 7.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.6% 5.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 16.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 11.9%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.6%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 10.4%, sitewide 6.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 9.3%, sitewide 3.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Author 7.2%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst