Publication summary
18%6 analyzed articles/videos5,435 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Open Vallejo results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 2,478 hits. Analysis detected 8,640 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,907 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 32% (375 of 550 publications). This Open Vallejo is better (less manipulative) than 68.10% of the peer group.
Open Vallejo
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
1%Signal Cleveland1%
1%Montana Free Press1%
1%The Trace1%
1%BridgeDetroit1%
32%Open Vallejo (selected)2%
100%The White House9%
100%Utah Hockey Club10%
100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
100%MS NOW Live Events26%
100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
Publication details
Total words: 20,907
Article count: 6
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

32% percentile
025507510031.9% percentile
1.1% BS Score6 analyzed articles20.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 11.8%11.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Publication 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Publication 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Publication 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Publication 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Publication 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 11.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate