Topic summary
81% 12 analyzed articles/videos 6,911 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Online Safety results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 3,514 hits . Analysis detected 29,655 faulty-reasoning hits from 34,873 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 29% (16,044 of 22,465 topics). This Online Safety is better (less manipulative) than 71.40% of the peer group. Online Safety
Topic details
Total words: 34,873
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.6% percentile 1.8% BS Score12 analyzed articles34.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.1% 10.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Slippery Slope: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst