Author summary
91%2 analyzed articles/videos1,552 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Tettenborn results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 40.9% saturation with 2,541 hits. Analysis detected 10,873 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,208 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 83% (1,552 of 8,905 authors). This Andrew Tettenborn is worse (more manipulative) than 82.60% of the peer group.
Andrew Tettenborn
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
83%Andrew Tettenborn (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,208
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

83% percentile
025507510082.6% percentile
4.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 40.9%40.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 10.2%10.2%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 17.2%17.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 16.4%16.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.3%8.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.4%3.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.0%1.0%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Author 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 40.9%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 10.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 17.0%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 17.2%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Author 16.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Author 6.8%, sitewide 2.2%Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Straw Man: Author 5.7%, sitewide 0.9%Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.1%Horn Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.0%Slippery Slope: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos