Topic summary
98% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,696 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Obama Administration results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Fundamental Attribution Error , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28% saturation with 3,021 hits . Analysis detected 18,021 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,784 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 71% (7,157 of 24,545 topics). This Obama Administration is worse (more manipulative) than 70.80% of the peer group. Obama Administration
Topic details
Total words: 10,784
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.8% percentile 3.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 28.0% 28.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.3% 8.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Topic 8.5% 8.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Topic 6.4% 6.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 28.0%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 4.6% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 1.4% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Straw Man: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.0% Begging the Question: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst