Author summary
91% 4 analyzed articles/videos 5,732 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brian Karem results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 4,463 hits . Analysis detected 29,943 faulty-reasoning hits from 28,499 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 50% (4,670 of 9,205 authors). This Brian Karem is better (less manipulative) than 50.70% of the peer group. Brian Karem
Author details
Total words: 28,499
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.3% percentile 2.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles28.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.5% 5.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 15.7% 15.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.9% 14.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.1%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst