Topic summary
84% 7 analyzed articles/videos 3,379 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nutrition results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Indoctrination , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 2,339 hits . Analysis detected 24,234 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,479 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 45% (12,575 of 22,484 topics). This Nutrition is better (less manipulative) than 55.90% of the peer group. Nutrition
Topic details
Total words: 22,479
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.1% percentile 2.2% BS Score7 analyzed articles22.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 7.0% 7.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.5%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 0.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst