Author summary
68%4 analyzed articles/videos1,555 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Chapados results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 672 hits. Analysis detected 7,350 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,576 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 49% (4,546 of 8,801 authors). This Andrew Chapados is better (less manipulative) than 51.60% of the peer group.
Andrew Chapados
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
49%Andrew Chapados (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 8,576
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

48% percentile
025507510048.4% percentile
2.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles8.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.8%6.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.6%7.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.3%5.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.7%3.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.0%3.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.9%3.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 4.5%4.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 7.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.0%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate