Author summary
77% 1 analyzed article/video 846 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Susan Mayne results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 422 hits . Analysis detected 3,633 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,384 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 77% (2,223 of 9,471 authors). This Susan Mayne is worse (more manipulative) than 76.50% of the peer group. Susan Mayne
Author details
Total words: 3,384
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.5% percentile 3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.0% 9.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.4% 11.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 12.5% 12.5% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 7.9% 7.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.0% 5.0% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 5.8% 5.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 1.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 2.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Author 5.0%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Slippery Slope: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Composition/Division: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.4% Begging the Question: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst