Topic summary
83% 14 analyzed articles/videos 14,136 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nuclear Negotiations results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 4,195 hits . Analysis detected 39,251 faulty-reasoning hits from 60,976 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 11% (21,395 of 23,991 topics). This Nuclear Negotiations is better (less manipulative) than 89.20% of the peer group. Nuclear Negotiations
Topic details
Total words: 60,976
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.8% percentile 1.3% BS Score14 analyzed articles61K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst