Author summary
74% 8 analyzed articles/videos 7,734 analyzed words
BS Summary: These ADAM SCHRECK results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 3,172 hits . Analysis detected 18,330 faulty-reasoning hits from 29,185 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 24% (7,080 of 9,290 authors). This ADAM SCHRECK is better (less manipulative) than 76.20% of the peer group. ADAM SCHRECK
Author details
Total words: 29,185
Article count: 8
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.8% percentile 1.5% BS Score8 analyzed articles29.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.9% 10.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.1% 2.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst