Topic summary
⁠95%5 analyzed articles/videos2,809 analyzed words
BS Summary: These North Africa results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 2,506 hits. Analysis detected 17,004 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,872 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (11,080 of 24,545 topics). This North Africa is worse (more manipulative) than 54.90% of the peer group.
North Africa

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

55% percentile
025507510054.9% percentile
2.6% BS Score5 analyzed articles13.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.1%12.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 18.1%18.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.8%10.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.8%9.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 5.9%5.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 18.1%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.1%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos