Author summary
93% 1 analyzed article/video 1,120 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Leah Whitson results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 29.8% saturation with 1,333 hits . Analysis detected 5,510 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,480 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 76% (2,289 of 9,468 authors). This Sarah Leah Whitson is worse (more manipulative) than 75.80% of the peer group. Sarah Leah Whitson
Author details
Total words: 4,480
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 75.8% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 29.8% 29.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.2% 8.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 10.2% 10.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.0% 10.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Confirmation Bias: Author 29.8%, sitewide 7.5% Framing Effect: Author 8.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 10.2%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.0%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.9%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst