Topic summary
⁠95%4 analyzed articles/videos4,340 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kristi Noem results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 4,100 hits. Analysis detected 23,886 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,736 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (12,204 of 22,487 topics). This Kristi Noem is better (less manipulative) than 54.30% of the peer group.
Kristi Noem

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510045.7% percentile
2.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles20.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.0%10.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.6%13.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.0%0.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos