Author summary
87% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,010 analyzed words
BS Summary: These C.J. Ciaramella results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 1,189 hits . Analysis detected 9,249 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,040 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 73% (2,551 of 9,195 authors). This C.J. Ciaramella is worse (more manipulative) than 72.30% of the peer group. C.J. Ciaramella
Author details
Total words: 8,040
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.3% percentile 3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.8% 14.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 12.0% 12.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.2% 13.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.2% 4.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.9% 0.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.8% 7.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 14.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.2%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.8%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 5.9%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.1%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst