Author summary
82% 1 analyzed article/video 2,040 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Susan Greene results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Anecdotal , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21% saturation with 2,568 hits . Analysis detected 12,018 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,240 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 51% (4,646 of 9,452 authors). This Susan Greene is worse (more manipulative) than 50.90% of the peer group. Susan Greene
Author details
Total words: 12,240
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.9% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles12.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.8% 9.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 21.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.8%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Red Herring: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst