Author summary
98% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,166 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robert Reich results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.1% saturation with 3,964 hits . Analysis detected 29,554 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,197 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 77% (2,260 of 9,471 authors). This Robert Reich is worse (more manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group. Robert Reich
Author details
Total words: 17,197
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.1% percentile 3.4% BS Score5 analyzed articles17.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 23.1% 23.1% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 12.8% 12.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 15.2% 15.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 14.1% 14.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.5% 5.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.7% 10.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 23.1%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 16.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.7%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 15.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 14.1%, sitewide 7.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 12.8%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.9%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst