Topic summary
42% 14 analyzed articles/videos 14,243 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Justice results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 4,979 hits . Analysis detected 36,346 faulty-reasoning hits from 55,529 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 11% (20,433 of 22,926 topics). This Justice is better (less manipulative) than 89.10% of the peer group. Justice
Topic details
Total words: 55,529
Article count: 13
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.9% percentile 1.3% BS Score13 analyzed articles55.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.0% 9.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst