Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These James Scott results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 341 hits. Analysis detected 1,271 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,644 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 8,933 authors). This James Scott is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
James Scott
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%James Scott (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 2,644
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.6%3.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 6.8%6.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.9%4.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 12.9%12.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 2.1%2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 6.2%6.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 4.0%4.0%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Author 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Author 12.9%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Author 6.8%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Composition/Division: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos