Topic summary
83% 12 analyzed articles/videos 14,413 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gentrification results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 3,881 hits . Analysis detected 43,423 faulty-reasoning hits from 61,081 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 17% (19,768 of 23,563 topics). This Gentrification is better (less manipulative) than 83.90% of the peer group. Gentrification
Topic details
Total words: 61,081
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.1% percentile 1.4% BS Score12 analyzed articles61.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.0% Indoctrination: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst