Author summary
76% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,677 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mohammed Ahmad results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Emotion , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 1,445 hits . Analysis detected 11,023 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,708 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 59% (3,833 of 9,257 authors). This Mohammed Ahmad is worse (more manipulative) than 58.60% of the peer group. Mohammed Ahmad
Author details
Total words: 10,708
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.6% percentile 2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.8% 9.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.5% 13.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.5% 4.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 12.5% 12.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.8%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 12.5%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.6%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 2.0% Indoctrination: Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst