Publication summary
63% 9 analyzed articles/videos 13,058 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Knock LA results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 4,709 hits . Analysis detected 42,398 faulty-reasoning hits from 51,125 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 53% (270 of 570 publications). This Knock LA is worse (more manipulative) than 52.70% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 51,125
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.7% percentile 1.6% BS Score9 analyzed articles51.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Publication SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 7.7% 7.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.4% 3.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.5% 1.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Publication 0.1% 0.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 7.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 8.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 6.1%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 7.2%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 3.7%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst