Author summary
7% 1 analyzed article/video 1,668 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Serena Zets results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 4.1% saturation with 271 hits . Analysis detected 1,820 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,672 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 7% (8,579 of 9,143 authors). This Serena Zets is better (less manipulative) than 93.80% of the peer group. Serena Zets
Author details
Total words: 6,672
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.2% percentile 1.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst