Topic summary
90% 7 analyzed articles/videos 5,095 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Policy results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Pessimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 3,419 hits . Analysis detected 22,153 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,898 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 49% (11,276 of 21,999 topics). This Federal Policy is better (less manipulative) than 51.30% of the peer group. Federal Policy
Topic details
Total words: 18,898
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.7% percentile 2.4% BS Score7 analyzed articles18.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 18.1% 18.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.3% 11.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 10.3% 10.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 6.9% 6.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 18.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 7.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 1.9% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Slippery Slope: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.0% False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst