Author summary
60%6 analyzed articles/videos3,910 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ben Szalinski results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 1,956 hits. Analysis detected 13,785 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,080 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 16% (7,163 of 8,521 authors). This Ben Szalinski is better (less manipulative) than 84.10% of the peer group.
Ben Szalinski
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
16%Ben Szalinski (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 22,080
Article count: 6
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

16% percentile
025507510015.9% percentile
1.4% BS Score6 analyzed articles22.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.9%8.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.8%6.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.3%7.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.4%2.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate