Author summary
23%4 analyzed articles/videos3,229 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Capitol News Illinois results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 993 hits. Analysis detected 7,194 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,916 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 16% (7,161 of 8,521 authors). This Capitol News Illinois is better (less manipulative) than 84.00% of the peer group.
Capitol News Illinois
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
16%Capitol News Illinois (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 12,916
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

16% percentile
025507510016.0% percentile
1.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles12.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.0%6.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.5%5.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.7%7.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate