Topic summary
59% 8 analyzed articles/videos 9,018 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Grants results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 3,029 hits . Analysis detected 23,719 faulty-reasoning hits from 33,911 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 16% (19,919 of 23,516 topics). This Federal Grants is better (less manipulative) than 84.70% of the peer group. Federal Grants
Topic details
Total words: 33,911
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.3% percentile 1.4% BS Score8 analyzed articles33.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst