Author summary
⁠1%2 analyzed articles/videos4,865 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cleveland Documenters results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Loss Aversion, and Indoctrination, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 1.1% saturation with 206 hits. Analysis detected 1,513 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,460 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (8,553 of 8,558 authors). This Cleveland Documenters is better (less manipulative) than 99.90% of the peer group.
Cleveland Documenters
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠1%Cleveland Documenters (selected)1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 19,460
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.1% percentile
0.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles19.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.1%0.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.2%0.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.2%0.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos