Topic summary
82% 48 analyzed articles/videos 23,667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Consumer Electronics results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 13,220 hits . Analysis detected 90,111 faulty-reasoning hits from 98,582 analyzed words across 48 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 31% (15,334 of 21,945 topics). This Consumer Electronics is better (less manipulative) than 69.90% of the peer group. Consumer Electronics
Topic details
Total words: 98,582
Article count: 48
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.1% percentile 1.8% BS Score48 analyzed articles98.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 13.4% 13.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 10.1% 10.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst