Author summary
78% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,607 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kyle Barr results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.7% saturation with 1,559 hits . Analysis detected 7,827 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,900 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 68% (2,753 of 8,538 authors). This Kyle Barr is worse (more manipulative) than 67.80% of the peer group. Kyle Barr
Author details
Total words: 7,900
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.8% percentile 3.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles7.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.7% 4.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 19.7% 19.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.1% 2.1% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 3.8% 3.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 19.7%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst